How to Learn About the Circularity of Modal Fabric

by

A Guide to Understanding Modal Fabric’s Circularity in Fashion

The fashion industry’s impact on the environment is a pressing issue, and a key strategy for mitigating this is a shift toward a circular economy. This involves designing products that can be reused, repaired, and recycled, moving away from the traditional “take-make-dispose” linear model. When it comes to textiles, understanding the circularity of modal fabric is a practical and valuable skill for designers, brands, and conscious consumers. Modal, a type of rayon made from spun beech tree cellulose, is often marketed as a sustainable alternative. But how circular is it really? This guide provides a definitive, in-depth framework for learning about and assessing modal’s circularity, equipping you with the knowledge to make informed decisions.

Step 1: Deconstruct Modal’s Raw Material Sourcing

The journey to understanding modal’s circularity begins at its origin: the raw material. Modal is made from cellulose, a natural polymer found in the cell walls of plants. For modal, this cellulose is extracted from beech trees.

  • Actionable Explanation: Your first step is to investigate the sourcing of the beech wood pulp. The critical question isn’t just “Is it a tree?” but “Where does the tree come from?” and “How is it managed?”

  • Concrete Example: A brand claims its modal is “eco-friendly.” A savvy learner would look for specific certifications. Are they sourcing from forests certified by organizations like the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) or the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC)? These certifications ensure the wood comes from responsibly managed forests, meaning no old-growth forests were cleared, and biodiversity and ecological integrity were protected. You’d find out if the wood pulp is a byproduct of other industries, like the timber industry, or if it’s harvested specifically for fiber production. The ideal scenario is that it comes from sustainably managed, fast-growing forests or is a byproduct, reducing overall resource strain.

Step 2: Scrutinize the Manufacturing Process

Once the wood pulp is sourced, it must be processed into a usable fiber. This is a chemical-intensive process, and its environmental footprint is a major factor in assessing circularity. The chemicals used and the waste generated are key areas to investigate.

  • Actionable Explanation: Focus on the solvent and water usage. Modal is a regenerated cellulose fiber, meaning the cellulose is dissolved and then “spun” back into a fiber. The type of solvent used is crucial. Some solvents are more toxic and less recoverable than others. Additionally, the process is water-intensive.

  • Concrete Example: You’d compare the manufacturing processes of different modal producers. For instance, a leading producer, Lenzing, has a proprietary process that claims to be more circular. They use a closed-loop system, where up to 99.8% of the water and solvents are recovered and reused. This significantly reduces the environmental impact compared to a traditional open-loop system that discharges untreated or partially treated wastewater. To learn about this, you’d research the specific names of these processes, such as Lenzing’s “Eco Soft technology.” You’d also look for certifications like EU Ecolabel, which is awarded to products with a low environmental impact throughout their life cycle.

Step 3: Evaluate the Durability and Use Phase

A circular product is one that lasts. If a garment falls apart after a few washes, it’s not circular, regardless of its material origin. The durability and longevity of modal fabric are critical for extending its lifespan and reducing waste.

  • Actionable Explanation: During the use phase, a circular material should be durable, washable without significant degradation, and able to withstand multiple wears. The less frequently a garment needs to be replaced, the more circular it is.

  • Concrete Example: To assess modal’s durability, you could look at its properties. Modal is known for being stronger than conventional rayon when wet, making it more resistant to shrinkage and stretching during washing. Its smooth surface also makes it less prone to pilling. To practically assess this, you might compare customer reviews of a modal shirt versus a conventional cotton shirt from the same brand, looking for comments on pilling, fading, and shape retention after multiple washes. You would also consider the fabric’s blend. Modal is often blended with cotton or spandex. A blend can alter its durability and recyclability. A high-quality 100% modal fabric might be more durable and easier to recycle than a modal-polyester blend, which is a major circularity challenge.

Step 4: Understand the End-of-Life Scenarios

This is the most critical and often most overlooked aspect of circularity. A truly circular material must have viable and scalable end-of-life options. This means it can be composted, biodegraded, or recycled back into new textile fibers.

  • Actionable Explanation: The goal is to avoid the landfill. You need to investigate what happens to modal fabric when a consumer is finished with it. Can it be easily recycled? Does it biodegrade? The answers to these questions reveal the true circular potential.

  • Concrete Example: Modal is a biodegradable material. Since it’s made from plant cellulose, it will decompose naturally in a landfill or compost pile. The speed of decomposition depends on the environmental conditions (temperature, moisture, microorganisms). To learn about this, you’d search for scientific studies on the biodegradation rates of modal. You might find that it takes a few months to fully decompose in a home compost pile. However, this is only part of the story. The ultimate circularity goal is textile-to-textile recycling. Currently, recycling regenerated cellulose fibers like modal is a significant challenge. The chemical and mechanical processes for recycling blended fabrics are complex and often not commercially viable on a large scale. A learner would investigate companies and technologies, such as the Worn Again technology, that are working on this challenge. They’d also assess the availability of take-back programs from brands that collect old garments for recycling, which indicates a commitment to a circular model.

Step 5: Identify and Analyze Certifications

Certifications are a brand’s way of communicating its environmental claims. Learning how to read and interpret these certifications is a fundamental skill for assessing circularity. They provide a standardized, third-party verified source of information.

  • Actionable Explanation: Don’t just accept a certification at face value. Understand what it actually certifies. Is it about the raw material sourcing? The manufacturing process? The final product’s biodegradability? A single certification doesn’t cover all aspects of circularity.

  • Concrete Example: Let’s look at a few key certifications.

    • FSC/PEFC: As mentioned earlier, these certify the responsible management of the forests from which the wood pulp is harvested. Seeing this on a product label tells you the first step of the supply chain is managed sustainably.

    • EU Ecolabel: This is a comprehensive certification that evaluates the entire lifecycle of a product. For textiles, it covers criteria from raw material to end-of-life, including water and air emissions, energy use, and chemical content. This is a strong indicator of a brand’s circular commitment.

    • OEKO-TEX Standard 100: This certification focuses on human health and safety by ensuring the finished textile product is free from harmful substances. While crucial for consumer safety, it doesn’t directly speak to the circularity of the production process or end-of-life. A savvy learner would recognize this distinction.

    • Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS): GOTS is primarily for organic natural fibers, like cotton. While modal isn’t organic, you might see a brand that uses both GOTS-certified cotton and certified modal. This indicates a broader commitment to sustainable practices.

You must learn to read a product label and piece together the story these certifications tell about the product’s circular journey. A brand claiming “sustainable” modal without any specific certifications is a red flag. A brand with FSC, EU Ecolabel, and OEKO-TEX certifications tells a much more detailed and verifiable story.

Step 6: Investigate Brand-Specific Initiatives and Supply Chains

Brands that are truly committed to circularity are often transparent about their supply chain and have specific programs in place. This goes beyond simply using a certified material. It’s about taking responsibility for the product’s entire life cycle.

  • Actionable Explanation: Go beyond the product itself and investigate the brand’s actions. What are they doing to close the loop? Are they just sourcing a “better” material, or are they actively working on end-of-life solutions?

  • Concrete Example: A brand might advertise its modal collection with a “circular” claim. A good learner would dig deeper. Do they have a take-back program where customers can return old garments for recycling or upcycling? Do they partner with a textile recycling facility? A great example would be a brand that not only uses modal from a closed-loop producer but also collaborates with a startup that’s developing technology to break down and recycle modal and other cellulose fibers. You’d search their website’s sustainability report, blog, or press releases for details on these specific programs. Look for specific, quantifiable goals and results, not just generic mission statements. For example, “We aim to use 100% certified modal by 2025” is a concrete goal. “We are committed to sustainability” is not.

Step 7: Compare Modal to Other Fibers

To fully understand modal’s circularity, you must put it into context. How does it stack up against other popular fibers, both natural and synthetic? This comparative analysis provides a more nuanced and comprehensive perspective.

  • Actionable Explanation: Compare modal to cotton, polyester, and other regenerated cellulose fibers like Tencel and viscose. Consider all phases of the lifecycle: raw material, production, use, and end-of-life.

  • Concrete Example:

    • Modal vs. Cotton: While cotton is a natural fiber and biodegradable, its conventional production is notoriously water-intensive and often uses large amounts of pesticides. Organic cotton addresses the pesticide issue but is still water-intensive. Modal, especially from a closed-loop system, can have a significantly lower water footprint. However, cotton is much easier to mechanically and chemically recycle than modal. A circularity assessment would weigh these trade-offs.

    • Modal vs. Polyester: Polyester is a synthetic fiber derived from petroleum. It’s incredibly durable and has a low water footprint, but it is not biodegradable. It contributes to microplastic pollution and is difficult to recycle into new, high-quality textile fibers. In this comparison, modal is clearly more circular due to its biodegradability and plant-based origin.

    • Modal vs. Lyocell (Tencel): Tencel is another brand of lyocell, a regenerated cellulose fiber. It’s often considered the “gold standard” for sustainable cellulose fibers. Its production process uses a non-toxic solvent (N-methylmorpholine N-oxide, or NMMO) in an even more efficient closed-loop system than many modal processes. The solvent recovery rate for Tencel is even higher than for closed-loop modal. A circularity learner would recognize that while both are good options, Tencel often has a slight edge in production circularity.

By conducting these comparisons, you’ll develop a nuanced understanding that no fiber is a perfect solution. Each has its strengths and weaknesses, and circularity is a spectrum, not an on/off switch.

Step 8: Consider the Social Dimension of Circularity

Circularity isn’t just about environmental impact; it also has a crucial social component. Fair labor practices, safe working conditions, and ethical treatment of workers are integral to a truly sustainable and circular system.

  • Actionable Explanation: A product can’t be “circular” if it’s produced under exploitative conditions. A holistic assessment of circularity must include the social equity of the supply chain.

  • Concrete Example: You’d investigate the labor practices of the factories that produce the wood pulp and the modal fiber. Certifications like SA8000 or the Fair Trade standard, though less common for raw materials, are excellent indicators. You’d also look for brand transparency about their manufacturing partners. Does the brand publicly list its factories? Do they have a code of conduct for suppliers? This level of detail shows a commitment to not just environmental, but also social, circularity. A brand that uses certified modal but doesn’t have a transparent supply chain for its garment factories is only addressing part of the circularity puzzle.

Conclusion

Understanding the circularity of modal fabric requires a detailed, multi-faceted approach that moves beyond superficial claims. It’s a journey that starts with the tree and ends with its end-of-life potential. By following this guide, you can confidently and practically assess a product’s circularity by deconstructing its raw material sourcing, scrutinizing its manufacturing process, evaluating its durability, understanding its end-of-life options, interpreting certifications, investigating brand initiatives, and comparing it to other fibers. The key is to be an active, critical learner, asking pointed questions and seeking verifiable evidence at every stage of the supply chain. This approach not only empowers you to make better choices but also holds the fashion industry accountable, pushing it closer to a truly circular and sustainable future.